American Exceptionalism Is Expendable

July 25, 2011

Those who believe in “American Exceptionalism” should be  aware that the “qualitative difference” between America and other nations that make us exceptional is a depreciable asset.  It is diminished when our elected officials act like they’re running a third world country.

How can you be exceptional if your elected officials behave like spoiled four-year olds, stomping their feet and demanding their own way on every point?

How can you be exceptional if  you tell the capital markets, on whom you are completely dependent for funding and the future of your society, that you’re not capable of governing yourself and managing your affairs?

I see no path to correct this situation quickly, so we’re stuck with this for the foreseeable future.

Alexis de Tocqueville said that “in a democracy, the people get the government they deserve.”  This is our fault.  Enough of us don’t go to the ballot box and those of us that do go are careless once there.  We’ve created a society in which those best capable of guiding our country understandably don’t want to expose themselves and their families to the unnecessarily intense spotlight of public life, driven by an entertainment-media culture that is not driven by giving the American public information, but is instead driven by its own ratings–in the guise of providing “information” and generating conflict among leaders and elected officials.

I am exceptionally concerned about what the near term future holds for us.


Get Rid of the Debt Ceiling

July 24, 2011

If our leaders and back-benchers agree that the debt ceiling will be raised and we won’t default on our obligations (not just our debt–US Treasury notes and bonds, but obligations to states, municipalities, retirees, etc.), why does Congress require itself to vote on the matter?

The irrelevance of the debt ceiling, except as a political cudgel with which to beat the party in the White House, has been revealed.  It’s a completely pro forma, artificial two-step process that adds exactly zero value to the budgeting process–where Congress and the President make their spending decisions.  Keeping this charade going only tempts fate in the future.   Abolish it.


An Unexpected Education – Update

July 21, 2011

Earlier this week, in Part 1 of what could be an ongoing series, I detailed the unexpected education I received courtesy of C-SPAN about the correlation between the tips that lap dancers receive and where they are in their menstruation cycle.  Who knew?

Now comes a story in The Atlantic Monthly, another non-crackpot source, detailing the linkage between penile size and economic growth.

That’s right, penis size. In a study published [July 18], the University of Helsinki’s Tatu Westling points out a surprising strong correlation between a country’s GDP growth rate and average penile length. As the chart above shows, countries that averaged smaller penis sizes grew at a faster rate than their larger counterparts between 1960 and 1985. Every centimeter increase in penis size accounted for a 5 to 7 percent reduction in economic growth. The study also showed that overall GDP was at its highest in countries with average-sized penises with GDP falling at the extremes of penis length.

Slow Economic Growth = Giant Manhood

So, if this is true, China, with its GDP growing at like 10% per year, is full of guys with exceptionally tiny Wangs (if this is not the Chinese word for “Johnson”, it should be).  As the Atlantic points out, “some fast-growing countries may be compensating for something. ”  There is apparently no discussion of the fact that more than half the world’s population lacks such equipment.

The study begs a question though.  What happens during recessions or depressions?  Does that average penis shrink?  Or is it the shrinkage of the penis that causes GDP to decline?  Which occurs first?  Perhaps Professor Westling can do another study.


An Interesting Day in Atlanta

July 19, 2011

Earlier today, I was doing some research about a topic I’m going to be writing about soon.  In doing so, I found myself on the website for the Atlanta Journal Constitution.  Before entering my search query, I scanned the front page to see what’s happening in Atlanta.  The page is gone now, but I grabbed an image of the screen.  I’m not auditioning for Jay Leno’s job (although I think that, with the help of Jay’s writers, I and a high percentage of the people I know could do just as good a job), but look at these headlines! (Click on the image of the paper to enlarge it.)

“Georgia Execution Drug Unsafe, Attorneys Say”.  REALLY?*  Isn’t that the point?  If they were safe they wouldn’t be very useful in trying to kill the prisoner now would they?

“Pauly Shore Alive…”.  What a relief that is!  I didn’t know that there were concerns that Pauly might actually not be alive.  I realize that his career has waned, but frankly the fact that he ever had a career to begin with is perhaps the biggest miracle this side of Lourdes.

“Woodstock Man Arrested for Allegedly Setting Teen On Fire During Sex”.  Now I’ve had some pretty great sex in my day, but never have I gotten so far along in the process as to generate enough friction to cause a fire!**  Doesn’t K-Y make products to prevent this kind of thing from happening?

Explanatory and Exculpatory Notes:

* Yes, I know that the defense lawyer is arguing that if the drug in question is painful to the prisoner as death comes and should the execution fail (a not uncommon occurrence, it turns out), the prisoner would have been harmed unnecessarily.  But that’s not funny.  The headline is funny.

** Yes, I know this is not what this means and it’s awful that someone allegedly tried to burn a teenager.  But that’s not funny.  Again, work with me on this.


An Unexpected Education

July 17, 2011

I’m a podcast listener and have been since the technology came into being.  I subscribe to thirteen podcasts (see below) and am listening to something almost every free moment, including when I mow the lawn.  Yes, that means that I wear headphones over top of my ear buds and yes it looks ridiculous.

For a while, I’ve meant to write of my love for American Public Media‘s daily podcast called “The Writer’s Almanac“.  Garrison Keillor spends five minutes talking about some event for that particular day that has a literary linkage.  More on that later.

Earlier today, I was listening to the After Words podcast from C-SPAN.  The podcast consists of a rebroadcast of the television show in which an author of a new work of non-fiction is interviewed by an expert on the book’s topic.  It usually makes for a more interesting interview than if it were conducted by a journalist with no prior knowledge of the topic.

The podcast in question featured Eduardo Porter, speaking on his book, “The Price of Everything–Solving the Mystery of Why We Pay What We Do”.  I’ve not read the book but as I understand it, it is in the field of “rational economics” a la “Freakonomics”.  This has been, until today, a topic of mild interest to me.

Mr. Porter begins the show with the following example:

“There’s some great research done by these psychologists at the University of New Mexico, who studied the tips paid to lap dancers.  And they found…that tips given to lap dancers at the peak of their fertility were much much higher…than for lap dancers who were at any other point in the[ir] cycle. And this was going on without anybody noticing. I mean the patrons did not know this, but something was happening to them, either it was a smell or the way the lap dancer moved or something that was leading them to pay more for that lap dancing experience. So clearly this was not some rational decision to pay more for a lap dance.”

I’m sure the next five minutes of what Mr. Porter had to say were interesting, but I can tell you that I didn’t hear it.  I was stuck on the concept that someone thought it would advance their economic research to talk to lap dancers about their menstruation cycles and then correlate it to their tips.  It’s a shame that Mr. Porter didn’t bring a graph with him.  Perhaps there’s one in the book.

It was when I came back out of my “economics of lap dancing tips” fog that I realized that it was time to reassess “rational economics” as a field of study and to be somewhat more selective in my podcast choices.  But I will admit that I did learn something new.  I can’t wait to spring this on someone at a cocktail party.

. . .

My Current Podcast List (in order as they appear in my iTunes):

APM’s The Writer’s Almanac

C-SPAN – After Words

ESPN: PTI

NPR: It’s All Politics (a comedy routine that’s in the guise of a political news show)

NPR: Planet Money

Old Jews Telling Jokes

PBS NewsHour

Slate’s Hang Up and Listen

Slate’s Political Gabfest

This American Life

Vanity Fair’s Writers Reading (authors read a chapter from their own books)

WTF with Marc Maron (a comedian interviews other comedians)


(Not So) Random Thoughts on the Debt Ceiling and the State of the Crisis

July 14, 2011

  • This is a crisis. A worldwide crisis.
  • Markets love testing the will of central bankers and giving them a number on how much they’re willing to spend to bail out Greece (or Spain or Italy) will only act as a challenge.
  • The only reason U.S. financial markets aren’t more tumultuous as the debt ceiling nonsense plays out is that their more worried about Europe blowing apart.  Not the Europe blowing up is a bigger deal than the U.S. defaulting, but it’s more immediate.  There’s, what? two whole weeks before they have to worry about a U.S. default.  Eons in trading time.
  • I think some in Congress (mostly Republicans) think that they can “fix” missing the deadline by simply passing something after the fact that raises the limit and returns the situation to the status quo ante.  That’s wrong.  Once we cross the Rubicon of default and (presumably) get downgraded, there’s no turning back.  Once a borrower indicates a willingness to consider not paying its debts, that borrower gets treated differently in the credit markets.  You can’t unring the bell. [That sound you hear is my favorite writer, George Orwell, hater of idiom, spinning in his grave at my use of two, no three! in one little bullet point. –ed.]
  • I stink at poker, but somehow I think that I’d like to play poker against President Obama.  Less so Senator Mitch McConnell.
  • Trying to negotiate with Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Petulant) reminds me of those discussions we had with our kids when they were twelve.
  • Being a big believer in the Law of Unintended Consequences, I continue to be very worried about this situation, and that fear grows with every passing day.
  • The combination of the Europe situation and our own a) immediate problems with potential default and b) our long-term structural deficits leave me fearful that we’re in for an extended period of austerity, slow- to no-growth, increasing distress among the populace and general trouble.
  • What’s happening in Europe is the sort of thing that used to start wars.
  • So if you think Europe is a bad place to invest and the U.S. is about to default, where are you going to put your money?  Corporate bonds?  (Communist) China?
  • The sinking, awful feeling I have is that this all is going to get much worse before it gets any better.

The Long Road

July 11, 2011

The Happy Couple

For a very long time now, when the conversation turns to relationships, people younger than I always marvel at how young I was when I got married.  The questioners are inevitably thirty-somethings who live in the city and are unattached and thinking their having the time of their lives, gallivanting around from bar to bar, ending at one filled with college kids with their hats turned backwards wearing t-shirts that were last laundered by the factory before they were sold.  Good times.

“You were twenty-three when you got married?!”

Yes, I was. But the truth of the matter is that we met on June 16, 1984, had our first date on June 30th and had essentially agreed to get married by September–when  I had just turned twenty-two.  So think about that kids–23 and we knew each other for about four months and we had a done deal.

It was a whirlwind.  A very fast and deep friendship developed instantly, then it was off to the races.  A fourth of July weekend on her high school friend’s boat, an August introduction to her entire family–still one of the loudest gatherings of 13 people I’ve ever attended–then a September trip to see mine.  My father hadn’t been in her presence for more than a couple of hours when I told him that I was finished looking.  This was it.  It wasn’t going to get any better than this.  I had found her.  He understood.

There was magic in her eyes and in her laugh. She committed the grave mistake of laughing at things I found funny, which just encouraged me (still does).  I think our fate was sealed when we laughed together at lunch one day about the use of “Morning Has Broken” in church, only to see it on a video tape they showed us in training class that afternoon. Hilarity ensued.  The two of us, sitting across the room from each other made fools of ourselves trying to stifle our laughter.  Only the two of us were in on the joke.  Our joke.

No matter who was in the room, she was the most interesting person I could find to talk to.  And on one very warm, humid July day in 1986, she agreed to be my wife.  To this day it was the greatest and most humbling thing that’s ever happened to me.  Everything that’s followed it has paled in comparison.

I remind my young friends that this is not a contest to see who can hold out the longest.  You’re lucky in life if you can find one person with whom you want to spend the rest of your days and you’re a fool if you let that person walk away from you simply because you’re “not ready”.  Life is too short and loneliness is too tough.  Your aim is to “be ready”, because sometimes the best things come to you without warning.

. . .

Our lives since then have been much like the Kennedy expressway.  Smooth and straight for stretches, then curvy and full of potholes that come upon you without warning.  Followed by orange construction cones as far as the eye can see as the highway gets repaired and smoothed out.  Some times you can speed through it and other times it seems like it takes days to make it to the destination.  But the road never closes and there’s always a path through it, no matter how bad the accident is.

There’s no way to do justice to all that we’ve been through together.  The kids.  The victories large and small, the inconveniences, and mild tragedies.  Some self-imposed, others thrust upon us.  All done together–the only way I could have ever survived it.  There is still magic in her eyes and in her laughter.  It is the elixir of my life.

Those that know me understand that there’s no higher compliment to be paid to her than to say that she has successfully endured me and my nonsense for these last twenty-five years.  All of it with her dignity and sense of humor largely intact.  What has appeared on these pages doesn’t even get you to the Base Camp of the Everest of the challenges I present and that she has managed with such aplomb.

. . .

Neither of us suffer campiness lightly.  As noted above, it’s one of the common traits that bind us together.   I found the first stanza of the poem below a while ago and only recently realized that it was part of a much longer piece by Roy Croft.  I understand it’s one of those things that people have read at their weddings along with the “clanging gong” letter from St. Peter.  Be that as it may, it reflects my feelings of love and gratitude better than I could myself.

Thanks, Midge.  I love you.  Happy Anniversary.

I love you,
Not only for what you are,
But for what I am
When I am with you.

I love you,
Not only for what
You have made of yourself,
But for what
You are making of me.
I love you
For the part of me
That you bring out;
I love you
For putting your hand
Into my heaped-up heart
And passing over
All the foolish, weak things
That you can’t help
Dimly seeing there,
And for drawing out
Into the light
All the beautiful belongings
That no one else had looked
Quite far enough to find.

I love you because you
Are helping me to make
Of the lumber of my life
Not a tavern
But a temple;
Out of the works
Of my every day
Not a reproach
But a song.

I love you
Because you have done
More than any creed
Could have done
To make me good
And more than any fate
Could have done
To make me happy.
You have done it
Without a touch,
Without a word,
Without a sign.
You have done it
By being yourself.
Perhaps that is what
Being a friend means,
After all.


The DSK Case and its Message to Sexual Predators

July 2, 2011

Dominique Strauss-Kahn has been released on his own recognizance and is, according to the The New York Times much closer to have the most serious charges against him dropped.  But this turn of events is not because prosecutors no longer believe the woman wasn’t attacked.  Oh no, the Times reports,

“Prosecutors said they still believed Mr. Strauss-Kahn had forced the woman into sex… “

According to the sources, the victim is alleged to have not told the truth about her life leading up to the attack and what happened in the immediate aftermath of it:

“Prosecutors disclosed that the woman had admitted lying in her application for asylum from Guinea; according to the letter, she ‘fabricated the statement with the assistance of a male who provided her with a cassette recording’ that she memorized. She also said that her claim that she had been the victim of a gang rape in Guinea was also a lie.

The woman also acknowledged that she had misrepresented her income to qualify for her housing, and had declared a friend’s child — in addition to her own daughter — as a dependent on tax returns to increase her tax refund.

 Her asylum application is inconsistent with the story she told police; she had hundreds of thousands of dollars deposited into her bank account, making her appear to be a go between for laundering drug money, etc.)”

Lying to the police about this sort of thing is without question a bad strategy.  I understand that these inconsistencies and her association with an incarcerated drug dealer leave her credibility in tatters, making it easy for the defense to turn the case into “Whom do you believe? The former head of the IMF or a lying  chambermaid who associates with convicted drug dealers?”  The defense will have a field day with this information at trial in raising reasonable doubt.  The prosecutors don’t want to lose–it would look bad for them at election time–so they’ll blame the victim and walk away from this as quickly as possible, hoping that none of it sticks to them for very long.  Good luck with that.

The physical evidence is said to support the crux of what the housekeeper has alleged:  She was set upon by a naked DSK against her will and sexually assaulted.  So we’re left with a victim of an attack and a predator (alleged predator?) out walking the streets.

One is left to think that Monsieur Strauss-Kahn was extremely fortunate in his choice of victims.  The failure to bring DSK to justice on those charges will leave those looking to perpetrate similar crimes advised to find equally untrustworthy victims for themselves.

Sadly, ’twas was ever thus.


Boehner Willing To Bet Financial Markets Get The Joke

June 29, 2011

Betting Humpty Won't Break

In an interview with Hannity yesterday, House Speaker Boehner showed that he is taking the Powell “Pottery Barn (you break it, you own it) Principle” to the extreme in saying that “nobody believes that the U.S. is going to walk away from its obligations” if the federal debt ceiling is not raised by August 2nd.

If he wants to bet that financial markets will believe that an organization like Congress (if one can something that incapable of functioning an “organization) will take the necessary steps to avoid default on US Treasury debt after they’ve watched the fiasco that has unfolded over the past six months on this topic then he’s welcome to it.  But he and his party then “own” the result.

I think that Speaker Boehner ought to spend a few minutes reading up on the Law of Unintended Consequences.  Did he not learn anything from the last financial crisis in which the situation quickly got beyond the control of those responsible, and it was only through extraordinary means that control, such as it is, was restored.

If Boehner is wrong, and I think that he is, the potential tornadic impact of his cavalier treatment of the world financial markets will make Gingrich’s shut down of government in 1995 look like a gentle spring shower.

Here’s the full video: http://video.foxnews.com/v/1029441983001/john-boehner-on-hannity


Great Moments in Modern Music – Marvin Gaye Edition

June 28, 2011

Though lip-synched, one of the finest moments in pop music occurs at about 1:10 as the first chorus ends and blends with the beginning of the second verse. Can I get a witness?