For David Giaimo

August 12, 2010

I didn’t know David Giaimo, but he entered my life at some point in 2008.

The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were raging.  The evening newscasts all ended with lists of the dead. There they were, in silence and black and white.  Page after page of the week’s tally of teenagers and twentysomethings, with the occasional 32-year old master sergeant.

I couldn’t stop thinking about the lists, the names, their ages.   I know 19-year olds.  My now 20-year old daughter knows kids in the service.  Although my cousins had served in the Army and Navy, this felt different to me.  We were kids then, without kids of our own, without the perspective that age brings.  This was a live fire environment.  Every night there was another list, age 19, age 22, age 24. Over and over.

I was too young to really understand Vietnam when it was happening.  I remember watching Huntley and Brinkley and seeing the jungle battles, the Huey helicopters, the stretchers, the protests, the draft card burning and the POWs and the POW bracelets.  My sister had one.  It haunted me. That was a guy in a jungle prison.  It was a lot for a 9-year old to process.

I don’t remember where I first saw the Hero Bracelet, but I think it was in watching news from the last presidential campaign.  Both Senators McCain and Obama had them.  I think one of the candidates, perhaps both, received the one he wore from the mother of a fallen soldier along the campaign trail.

I ordered one, and with it I met First Lieutenant David Giaimo from Waukegan, Illinois. A randomly-selected* name out of several thousand men and women from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.  I looked him up.  There was only a thimble full of information available about him.  Two-time state champion marksman, varsity baseball player, good friend, loving son, Army volunteer.  He died when his Humvee hit an IED in Tikrit, Iraq on August 12, 2005.  He was 24.


He walked into the fire.

I wore the bracelet often and got many questions about it. I know at least a few of the people who asked thought it was a silly gesture.  I know my telling what I knew of David’s story made some people uncomfortable, for keeping the war and the death as far out of their lives as possible was their primary goal.  Not in front of the children.  I was proud to spread the gospel of David’s service and what those like him did to others.  We must not forget what they had done and are doing on our behalf.

I wore the bracelet for quite a while, and then put it away.  The end of 2008 marked a change in my life—a beginning of what turned out to be sixteen months of unemployment —so wearing it while trying to get a job seemed somehow imprudent.   I wasn’t embarrassed by it, but first things first.  I didn’t want to give anyone an(other) excuse to not hire me, for I give plenty of those on my own.  Here I was, an unemployed banker with 25 years behind him in the worst financial and economic crisis the country had faced in 70 years, searching for meaning and a way to feed and educate three kids.

Though at times daunting, my wife and I were constantly aware that what we were living through seemed small relative what others were facing:  the struggles of a little girl with inoperable brain cancer with not much time left and a twin sister and family trying to deal with it; the impending loss of a home; people carrying burdens of unfathomable weight; David, his family and families like his.  There was plenty of suffering to go around.  I was just out of a job.

I’ve been working now for about four months. It’s not as good as it could be, but it’s better than staying home.  A couple of weeks ago, I happened by the television as Jim Lehrer was saying, “…and now, in silence, the names of the dead as released by the Pentagon.”  There it was again. Another list.  Age 19.  Age 22.  Age 24.  Even though I hadn’t been watching, the lists had never stopped.

The memory of David and his sacrifice returned to me.  It shook me that I had pushed his memory aside, for I never meant for that to happen.  I haven’t stopped thinking about him since.


He ran into the fire.

Lincoln said it best, “It is…for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain.”

The loss of David and all like him is only in vain if we forget.  On this the fifth anniversary of that fateful day, I remember.  However clumsy this is, it is my tribute to him.  I am grateful for his service.  I’m sorry for his loss.

*        A review of the website doesn’t show the ability to get a random bracelet for a soldier.  Since I bought mine, they’ve put a searchable database of the fallen from Iraq and Afghanistan, so you can pick an individual.

Obama: The Luckiest Politician Ever

June 9, 2009
Crazy like a Fox?

Crazy like a Fox?

It has to be true that no one in political life has been more fortunate in their choice of opponents than Barack Obama (i.e., Peter Fitzgerald, Carol Mosely Braun, Blair Hull and the seven dwarfs of the 2004 Democratic Senatorial primary , Jack Ryan, Alan Keyes, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, and now the rest of the circular firing squad known as the GOP leadership).  How else to explain Newt Gingrich stepping into a Reagan-loving minefield with his comments today?

Reagan at the U.N. on 6/19/82: “I speak today as both a citizen of the United States and of the world. … My people have sent me here today to speak for them as citizens of the world, which they truly are, for we Americans are drawn from every nationality represented in this chamber today.”

Newt today: “I am not a citizen of the world. I think the entire concept is intellectual nonsense and stunningly dangerous.”

Newt said this with no sense of irony.  As political theatre, it’s awesome to watch, in the same way a tornado is awesome to watch–that is, from a distance.  This may be Newt’s “Tonya Harding Moment”–one where he whacks an opponent, only to realize that doing it sinks himself and that the lunkheads that helped him do it, were, in fact, lunkheads.  Whoever writes Newt’s speeches or does his research should be handed over to Cheney and Addington for enhanced interrogation.  Does they not understand that people have access to the Google and can trace these things? If this was an accident, and he didn’t know that Reagan had said this, it may be the equivalent of Jerry Ford freeing the Poles from Soviet domination in the 1976 Presidential Debate with Jimmy Carter–the foot-shooting moment that everyone remembered as they went into the voting booth a few days later.

Perhaps I’m wrong.  Perhaps criticizing Reagan’s foreign policy is Newt’s new strategy to grab the mantle of leadership of the Republican Party.  After all, not many conservatives were comfortable with Reagan’s embrace of Gorby at Reykjavik.  Maybe he’s figuring that the best way to separate himself from the Republican pack is to separate himself from Reagan.  I doubt it, but can’t think of any other explanation (other than “oops, get me rewrite!”)

The good news for the Republicans is that it’s an eternity until anybody other than goobers like me start paying attention.  Time will tell.

%d bloggers like this: